人类学MODO讲习堂（第十三讲）
包含性对立：对于文化秩序中不变量的思考
ABOUT ENCOMPASSED CONTRARIES：Considering Invariants in Cultural Orders?
BY
美国弗吉尼亚大学人类学教授
( Department of Anthropology，University of Virginia，Charlottesville, Virginia，United States)
ON
7月8日,星期三，15:00-16:30
15:00-16:30, 8th.July, Wednesday
华东师范大学闵行校区法商北楼101
Room101, Fashang (Law and Business) Building (North), Minhang campus, ECNU (500 Dongchuan Road, Minhang) .
主讲人简介：
戴木德，普林斯顿大学博士（1978年），长期担任弗吉尼亚大学人类学教授。他在世界各地做过诸多学术演讲，作为社会人类学家，他的研究领域集中在印度洋－太平洋，主要是巴布亚新几内亚和中国东南沿海。他的课程和学术著作也涵盖现代西方社会，美国是其中的焦点。戴木德在中国做研究一年，田野主要在福建省泉州。他的著作以社会生产作为出发点，主要讨论仪式、交换和生产系统、民俗植物学和历法等等。
Frederick H. Damon (b. 1948)
Short bio
Frederick H. Damon earned his BA in Psychology at Duke University (1970) and Ph.D. in Anthropology from Princeton University (1978). He has taught at the University of Virginia since the 1976-77 academic year. He has lectured about his work in Australia, China, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Singapore, Spain and the US. He is a social anthropologist with regional interests in the Indo-Pacific, primarily Papua New Guinea and southeastern China. He also teaches and writes about modern Western societies, the United States his primary focus. Since 1973 he has spent more than 4 years on an island called Muyuw in Milne Bay Province (PNG), and since 1991 close to 1 year in China (PRC), mostly around Quanzhou in Fujian Province. Topically he has written about ritual, exchange and production systems, ethnobotany, and calendrical systems, employing symbolic approaches emanating from structuralism and the production orientation that developed from European Marxism in the 1960s and 1970s.
讲座内容：
本讲座从路易•杜蒙（Louis Dumont）的包含对立思想出发，探讨其对认识印度、南太平洋航海术、19世纪的美国或中国的社会结构的可能意义。杜蒙的模型最初是基于印度种姓制度的研究，提出“纯”与“不纯”之间的对立，但杜蒙的讨论忽略了分析性问题和可能性。
The Abstract：
This presentation discusses Louis Dumont’s ideas about encompassed contraries as they might be filtered through cultural orders in India, a South Pacific sailing structure, aspects of 19th century US social structure and perhaps China. Originally cast in terms of Dumont’s model of the Indian caste system, his opposition between the ‘pure’ and the ‘impure,’ the logical construct entails analytical problems and potentials overlooked in Dumont’s presentation. So where do we go with this interesting—and common?—cultural/logical device?
ALL ARE WELCOME!
Institute of Anthropology，ECNU
华东师范大学人类学研究所